www.MylesBrand.com

 

 

 

Murray Sperber:  A Bantam Biography

 

 

 

 

Along with Myles Brand (Jewish) and Mark Shaw (religion unknown), Murray Sperber (Jewish) played a role in the destruction of Robert Knight’s Indiana University coaching career.

 

Sperber’s also already playing a role in Brand’s reshaping of NCAA intercollegiate athletics.

 

Who Is Murray Sperber?

 

Murray Sperber’s a Professor of English and American Studies at Indiana University and a self-described “critic of college sports.”  Sperber claims that “Big-Time College Sports” are crippling undergraduate education at America’s universities and colleges.

 

[This writer has examined Indiana University textbooks and has a different thought on the crippling of undergraduate education.  Here’s the first line from an Indiana University required textbook:  “A knowledge of the writings of Marx and Engels is virtually indispensable to an educated person in our time…”  This is absolute craziness.  Marx was a proponent of Jewish Talmud Slave State Theology (Jewish supremacy).  Marx’s Jewish Supremacy Theology is Communism and led to the Jewish Red Terror and its millions of murder victims, untold human misery and crimes against humanity.  Rather than wasting time on Marx’s writings, college students would be better served by learning how it became possible for Jews to overthrow the Czarist government and replace it with their murderous Jewish Red Terror.  By learning this, college students would be more alert and able to exert positive control and influence over their own lives in today’s world.  It’s this writer’s unmistakable conclusion that one should look in the direction of certain professors, university presidents, administrators, textbook publishers, politicians, race-traitors, subverters, and supremacist groups, rather than in the direction of college sports, if one wants to learn about the crippling of undergraduate education.]

 

Sperber on Sperber

 

On September 12, 2000, Sperber published an article concerning Robert Knight and revealed much about himself.  According to Sperber:

 

Sperber’s Disliked

 

Sperber described himself as Indiana University basketball fans’ Enemy Number Three.  Why?  Because Sperber’s constant criticism of Robert Knight was offensive to Indiana University basketball community.

 

Sperber has referred to Knight as “The Emperor of Indiana” and has called Knight’s supporters “Knazis.”  (When certain Jews can’t debate the facts they scream “Nazi…Nazi…Nazi…Nazi” or “hater…hater…hater…hater.”)

 

Sperber has falsely accused Knight of having an attitude of being above the law and university policy.  In truth, Knight has been the honest citizen compared to Myles Brand and the Indiana University Trustees.

 

Sperber’s a Hypocrite

 

Sperber freely calls others derogatory names, but complains when his detractors react by calling him “spermie.’  It’s OK for Sperber to call Indiana students and alumni “Knazis.”  But call Sperber “spermie” and suddenly Sperber claims, “Pejorative names are part of their dehumanization process:  It is easier to threaten a cartoon character than a real person with a spouse and children.”  [The typical Jewish double standard.  Certain Jews call people Nazis and smear them…but as soon as someone returns the insult, these Jews cry and cry and shriek and whine.  How do people stand it?]

 

Sperber’s Unbelievable

 

When irate Indiana University basketball fans threatened Sperber, Sperber claims he thought about the safety of others, (not his own safety):

 

I lecture “150 students in a large hall, and graduate teaching assistants conduct the discussion sections of 25 freshmen in regular classrooms…I suddenly flashed on a scene where he [a person who had threaten Sperber], or some other lunatic, came flying through the door of a discussion section as a young teaching assistant and 25 freshman sat there.  Who knew what might ensue?  And I was responsible for the people in the room.  I helped choose the teaching assistants, and many of the students signed up for the course because they liked my topic.  I could not, I decided, teach under these circumstances.  I requested and received a leave of absence from Indiana University.”

 

Sperber expressed no fear of the ‘lunatic’ coming at him…oh! no!…Sperber claims he was concerned that a lunatic would mistake a teaching assistant for him and a poor innocent would be taken down, or a bystander student would be hit in the cross fire.  Sperber’s didn’t limit his self-expressed concern for humanity to Indiana University’s innocents, or the citizens of the state of Indiana, Sperber was concerned for everyone in the entire United States.  Sperber fled all the way to Montreal, Canada, so no poor innocent anywhere in the U.S. would accidentally be hurt when a lunatic went for Sperber.  According to Sperber, he fled because of his concern for mankind.  You agree, don’t you?

 

Sperber’s Obnoxious

 

Sperber is his own biggest devotee.  Sperber has carved a niche for himself as an expert on sports-related-alcohol-abuse.  When thousands of cheated Indiana University students protested and rioted against Myles Brand, it was Murray Sperber who pointed out that many of them were drunk.  As Sperber so proudly states:

 

“A mob of students, many of them drunk, marched on the president’s house, loudly protesting Knight’s firing.  Ironically, I just published a book, Beer and Circus, that examines the student fans of big-time college sports and their alcohol consumption and, while the TV coverage of the riot provided a perfect illustration of my theories, my intellectual triumph was tempered by the fact that the event occurred at my own university.”

 

Sperber has such a need for accolades that he has to throw them on himself.  Sperber pats himself on the back and proclaims his ‘intellectual triumph’ by stating that he’s the expert who’s fingered sports fans as just a bunch of drunks.

 

Interestingly, other newspaper and magazine accounts of the anti-Myles Brand protests failed to notice Sperber’s ‘intellectual triumph’ of the drunken protesters.  Obviously, Sperber could see more on television in Canada than those at the scene in Indiana could see.

 

Sperber Smears

 

Sperber’s argument technique is the ad hominem illegitimatizing and dehumanizing attack that’s typical of certain Jews.  In Sperber’s view, the students protesting Myles Brand’s unacceptable conduct are drunks.  Supposedly by claiming this, Sperber evaporates any legitimacy and validity of their protest against Myles Brand.

 

Sperber Isn’t Fair

 

Sperber doesn’t believe that a person smeared by Myles Brand should defend himself:

 

“The coach does not appear to be going quietly into that dark Knight [sic.].  Rather than exit gracefully, he has returned to campus and given interviews and speeches where he reveals his ‘side of the story.’  Then again, to my knowledge, the word ‘grace’ has never appeared in the same sentence with ‘Bob Knight.’”

 

This is typical of certain Jews…let the Jews tell their version of the story and then they express outrage and try to silence the victim when the victim wants to tell his ‘side of the story.”  [But, then again, the words “fairness” and “honor” never appeared in the same sentence as the word “—”…isn’t this correct, Mr. Sperber?]

 

Sperber Misrepresents

 

Sperber ignores the truth when he smears Robert Knight.

 

In Sperber’s article, Sperber discussed the practice session in which Knight grabbed a player by the neck.  Sperber claimed that the videotape of the 1997 practice session incident showed Knight “choking” the player.

 

The facts don’t support Sperber’s statement.  On May 15, 2000, four months prior to Sperber’s article, Indiana University Trustee President (at the time) John Walda (religion unknown) announced the results of the Trustee Investigation into the 1997 Knight “choking” allegation.  The Trustees’ investigation included interviews with 29 individuals, a private investigator’s work, and a videotape expert’s analysis.  Walda stated the investigation found that Knight grabbed the player by the neck but didn’t find that Knight “choked” the player.

 

In September 2000, Sperber was fully aware of the Trustee Investigation’s findings of no choking. Yet, in his September 12, 2000 article, Sperber went on the record referring to the known-to-be-false claim that Knight “choked” the player as though it were true.

 

Sperber Is Bitter

 

Sperber’s article exudes Sperber’s envy and bitterness over Robert Knight’s success.  It seems that if Sperber can’t have equal success, then Sperber will do his best to pull down Knight to make sure Knight can’t enjoy the rewards he earned through his hard work and dedication.

 

Sperber Quotes Marx

 

Sperber ends his article with a quote from Karl Marx…the Jew that blighted the world with his Jewish doctrines.

 

Sperber Is Sperber

 

“But at Indiana University I, along with most faculty members, want the school to return to its historic function as an academic institution…”

 

[and the teaching of Karl Marx and cunt art studies and lesbian analysis and condom usage and other similar gifts to the world…thanks, but no thanks, Mr. Sperber.]

 

What Is Murray Sperber?

 

Read Sperber’s article and then give the answer to these questions:  Is Murray Sperber a destroyer or a creator and builder?  Who would you prefer as your neighbor Murray Sperber or Robert Knight?

 

(article)

 

What Is Murray Sperber’s Role in NCAA Intercollegiate Athletics?

 

see Brand’s Plans for the NCAA

 

http://php.indiana.edu/~sperber/