|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Footnote |
|
|
|
to |
|
|
|
A Few Comments On The Jewish
Supremacist Organization |
|
Known As The American Jewish
Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
The Terrible Word “Judeo-Christian” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The word “Judeo-Christian” is a
colossally misleading, inaccurate, confusing, and offensive word. |
|
|
|
One way of identifying Jewish
perversion of Christianity is to look for the use of the word
“Judeo-Christian.” The word
“Judeo-Christian” is only used where Jews have had influence or input. This doesn’t mean that everyone using the
term has personally had direct Jewish influence…it means the doctrine of this
individual has come from Jews or Jewish propagandized individuals or sources. |
|
|
|
“Judeo-Christian” Is a Slur |
|
|
|
The major points for
understanding why “Judeo-Christian” is a slur word are: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin Freedman Exposed the Word in 1954 |
|
|
|
“Another
word is creating more problems among Christians. I refer to ‘Judeo-Christian.’ You see it more and more day by day. Based on our present knowledge of history,
and on good sense applied to theology, the term ‘Judeo-Christian’ presents a
strange combination. Does ‘Judeo’
refer to ancient ‘Pharaism,’ or to ‘Talmudism,’ or to so-called
‘Judaism?’ In view of what we know
today, how can there be ‘Judeo-Christian’ anything? Based upon what is now known
‘Judeo-Christian’ is as unrealistic as it would be to say anything is
‘hot-cold,’ or ‘old-young,’ or ‘heavy-light’ or that a person is
‘healthy-sick,’ or ‘poor-rich,’ or ‘dumb-smart,’ or ‘ignorant-educated,’ or
‘happy-sad.’ These words are antonyms,
not synonyms. ‘Judeo-Christian’ in the
light of incontestable facts are also anonyms, not synonyms as so-called or
self-styled ‘Jews’ would like Christians to believe. More sand for Christian’s eyes. |
|
|
|
“An
‘Institute of Judeo-Christian Studies’ has been established by Seton Hall
University. It is actually a ‘one-man
Institute.’ The ‘Institute of
Judaeo-Christain Studies’ occupies a small office in a down-town office
building in Newark, N. J. This
‘one-man Institute,’ according to their literature, has no faculty except
Father Oesterreicher, and no students.
Father Oesterreicher was born a so-called or self-styled ‘Jew’ and
became a convert to Catholicism. I
have had the pleasure of hearing him talk on many occasions. Addresses by Father Oesterreicher and
literature by mail are the principal activities of the ‘Institute of
Judaeo-Christian Studies.’ Father
Oesterreicher also plans to publish books and circulate them throughout the
world, in large quantities. |
|
|
|
“Father
Oesterreicher leaves no stones unturned to convince Catholics that
‘Judaeo-Christian’ is a combination of two words that are synonyms
theologically. Nothing could be
further from the truth. Father
Oesterreicher impresses that viewpoint upon his Catholic audiences. Father Oesterreicher talks to Catholic
audiences only, so far as I am able to tell.
In his addresses Father Oesterreicher impresses upon Catholics the
opinion he personally holds on the question of the dependence of the
Christian faith upon so-called ‘Judaism.’
His audiences depart Father Osterreicher’s addresses very much confused. |
|
|
|
“It
would make better Catholics out of Father Oesterreicher’s audiences if he
would ‘sell’ Jesus and the Catholic Church rather than try to ‘sell’
so-called ‘Judaism’ to his audiences. Well-planned
and well-financed publicity by so-called or self-styled ‘Jews’ manages to
keep Christians well informed on the subject of so-called ‘Judaism.’ If Father Oesterreicher would concentrate
upon ‘selling’ Jesus and the Christian faith to audiences of so-called or
self-styled ‘Jews’ he would be doing more towards realizing the objectives of
Christian effort.” Benjamin H.
Freedman (Catholic, born Jewish), Facts Are Facts, 1954, p.
71-72. (available here) (available
here) [No endorsement of this book
or these Internet sites is intended.
They are provided for academic research purposes only.] |
|
|
|
Benjamin Freedman, in Facts
Are Facts, cites seventeen passages in the Jewish Babylonian Talmud that
refer to Jesus Christ by using pseudonyms that Jewish scholars acknowledge
mean Jesus Christ. One of these says
Jesus Christ “died like a beast and was buried in an animal’s dirt
heap.” Facts Are Facts, 1954,
p. 65. |
|
|
|
Freedman (Facts Are Facts,
1954, p. 65-68.) then follows with one hundred and twenty-three cited
passages from the Jewish Babylonian Talmud that refer to Christians in
general, (again using acknowledged pseudonyms). These passages include statements by Jewish
Rabbis that: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What the Jews Have Said About Jesus Christ |
|
|
|
The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1905, volume 7, p 172, relates what the Jewish book
known as The Toledot says about Jesus Christ: |
|
|
|
“Jesus performed
all his miracles by means of magic… |
|
|
|
“He was
executed on the eve of the Passover festival, which was also the eve of the
Sabbath. The executioners were not
able to hang him upon a tree, for he had conjured all trees, by means of the
name of God, not to receive him, and therefore they all broke; he was finally
received by a large cabbage-stalk (comp. Targ. Sheni to Esth. vii. 9). He was buried on the same day, in
conformity with the Law, and the apostates [sic.], his disciples, wept at his
tomb. |
|
|
|
“According
to the ‘Toledot’ his disciples sought for his body in the tomb, but being
unable to find it they used the incident as proof before Queen Helena that he
who had been slain had ascended into heaven.
It then appeared that a man—sometimes called “Judas the Gardener”
(Judas Iscariot), sometimes, indefinitely, the ‘master of the garden’—had
taken the body out of the grave, used it as a dam to keep water out of his
garden, and had flooded the tomb. Then
there was joy again in Israel: the
body was taken before the queen at Jerusalem and the Christians were shamed.” |
|
|
|
Here’s What the Jews Considered the Word
‘Judeo-Christian’ to Mean in 1905 |
|
|
|
“MIN
(pl. Minim): Term used in the Talmud
and Midrash for a Jewish heretic or sectarian. Its etymology is obscure, the most
plausible among numerous explanations being that given by Bacher, namely,
that it is derived from the Biblical [word for] ‘species,’ which has received
in post-Biblical Hebrew the signification of ‘sect’’; and just as ‘goy,’
which in the Bible has only the meaning of ‘nation,’ took later the sense of
‘non-Jew’ so ‘min’ received also the signification of ‘sectary.’ As expressly stated by R. Nahman (Hul.
18b), the term ‘min’ is applied only to a Jewish sectary, not to a
non-Jew. It is variously used in the
Talmud and the Midrash for the Samaritan, the Sadducee, the Gnostic, the
Judeo-Christian, and other sectaries, according to the epoch to which the passage
belongs. Yerushalmi states that there
were, at the time of the destruction of the Temple, no less than twenty-four
kinds of minim (Yer. Sanh. x. 5). Thus
the min who (the Midrash states) derided Alexander the Great for rising
before the Jewish high priest Simon the Just (Lev. R. xiii.) was undoubtedly
a Samaritan. The minim referred to in
Berakot ix., on whose account the custom was established of closing the
benedictions with the words ‘from eternity to eternity’ in order to emphasize
the existence of more than one world, were undoubtedly Sadducees, who, as
known, denied the existence of another world.
In passages referring to the Christian period, ‘minim’ usually
indicates the Judeo-Christians, the Gnostics, and the Nazarenes, who often
conversed with the Rabbis on the unity of God, creation, resurrection, and
similar subjects (comp. Sanh. 39b). In
some passages, indeed, it is used even for ‘Christian’; but it is possible
that in such cases it is a substitution for the word ‘Nozeri,’ which was the
usual term for ‘Christian.’ |
|
|
|
“During
the first century of Christianity the Rabbis lived on friendly terms with the
minim. Rabbi Eliezer, who denied to
the heathen a share in the future life, is said to have discoursed with the Judeo-Christian
Jacob of Kefar Sekanya and to have quietly listened to the interpretation of
a Biblical verse he had received from Jesus (‘Ab. Zarah 16b; Eccl. R. i.
8). Ben Dama, a nephew of R. Ishmael,
having been bitten by a snake, allowed himself to be cured by means of an
exorcism uttered by the min Jacob, a Judea-Christian. These friendly feelings, however, gradually
gave way to violent hatred, as the minim separated themselves from all
connection with the Jews and propagated writings which the Rabbis considered
more dangerous to the unity of Judaism than those of the pagans. ‘The writings of the minim,’ says R.
Tarfon, ‘deserve to be burned, even though the holy name of God occurs
therein, for paganism is less dangerous than minut’: the former fails to
recognize the truth of Judaism from want of knowledge, bit the latter denies
what it fully knows’ (Shab. 116a). |
|
|
|
“On the
invitation of Gamaliel II., Samuel ha-Katan composed a prayer against the minim
which was inserted in the ‘Eighteen Benedictions’; it is called ‘Birkat
ha-Minim’ and forms the twelfth benediction; but instead of the original
‘Nozerim’ (= ‘Nazarenes’; see Krauss in ‘J.Q.R.’ v. 55; comp. Bloch, “Die
Institutionen des Judenthums,’ i. 193) the present text has ‘wela-malshiuim’
(= ‘and to the informers’). The cause of this change in the text was,
probably, the accusation brought by the Church Fathers against the Jews of
cursing the Christians under the name of the Nazarenes. It was forbidden to partake of meat, bread,
and wine with the min. Scrolls of the
Law, tefillin, and mezuzot written by a min were burned (Git. 45b; Yer Shab.
14b; ‘Ab Zarah 40b; Shulhan ‘Aruk, Orah Hayyim, 39, 1; ib. Yoreh
De’ah, 281,1). An animal slaughtered
by a min was forbidden food (Hul. 13a).
The relatives of the min were not permitted to observe the laws of
mourning after his death, but were required to assume festive garmets and
rejoice (Sem. ii 10; Yored De’ah, 345).
The testimony of the min was not admitted in evidence in Jewish courts
(Shulhan ‘Aruk, Hoshen Mishpat, 34, 22); and an Israelite [the text means
Jew, definitely not Israelite] who found anything belonging to one who was a
min was forbidden to return it to him (see Hoshen Mishpat, 266, 2). |
|
|
|
“According
to Maimonides (‘Yad,’ Teshubah, iii) the term ‘min’ is applied to five
classes of heretics: to those who deny
the existence of God and His providence; to those who believe in two or in
more than two gods [the Christians and their Trinity]; to those who ascribe
to God form and figure; to those who maintain that there existed before the
creation of the world something besides God; and to those who worship stars,
planets, or other things in order that these may act, as intermediaries between
them and the Master of the World.” The
Jewish Encyclopedia, 1905, volume 8, p. 594-595. |
|
|
|
Here’s What the Jews Considered the Word
‘Jewish-Christian’ to Mean in 1941 |
|
|
|
“EBIONITES,
Jewish Christian sect that was in existence from the 2nd to 4th centuries C.
E. The early Christians believed that
self-imposed poverty was a meritorious way of preparing for the imminent
advent of the Messianic kingdom (cf. Luke 6:20, 24; 12: 16-21); accordingly,
they disposed of all their property and were organized in communistic
societies (Acts 4: 34-37). They
probably voluntarily assumed the name “Ebionim” (‘ebyonim, ‘the
poor’), since in the Psalms and other passages of the Bible the word
is often used in speaking of the afflictions of the righteous. In a later period, when the term
‘Christians’ had become the usual designation, Ebionites was the term applied
to the Jewish Christians. |
|
|
|
‘As Christianity
became more and more Hellenized, and the Jewish Christians had been absorbed
into the masses of the heathens who had become converted to Christianity,
‘Ebionites’ became the name of a heretical Jewish Christian sect that
acknowledged Jesus as master but denied his divinity and the virgin
birth. They observed the Jewish law
(the author may possibly mean the Israelite-Mosaic Law and not the Jewish
Talmud Law, which is totally different], and, in contradistinction to the
‘Nazarenes,’ demanded the same observance on the part of the Gentile
Christians. Some of them added gnostic
speculations to their doctrines.
Eusebius states that they lived in Hobah, to the north of Damascus,
and considers Symmachus, the translator of the Bible into Greek, as one of
their members. One or two church
fathers ascribed the derivation of the name of the sect to a supposed
founder, Ebion; but such a character never existed.” The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia,
1941, volume 3, p. 619-620. |
|
|
|
Here’s What the Jews Considered the Word
‘Jewish-Christian’ to Mean in 1942 |
|
|
|
“JEWISH
CHRISTIANS, that group within the early Christian church which continued to
observe the Jewish ritual and ceremonial law which, as they maintained, had been
confirmed in its validity by Jesus himself.
They did not regard Christianity as a new religion but as merely a new
group in Judaism, distinguished from other Jews only by their belief that
Jesus was the Messiah. On the other
hand, there were Christian leaders who believed that, to win over the
heathens, it might be possible to permit these new converts to dispense with
the arduous regulations of the Jewish law.
Thus a new group, the heathen Christians, arose which constantly
struggled with the Jewish Christians and ultimately became dominant. As a result of their final defeat and the
disappearance of their sacred books and records, the sources for the history
of the Jewish Christians are extremely meager. Their leaders seem to have been the two brothers
of Jesus; whether Peter was originally of their party, opposing Paul, the
‘apostle to the Gentiles,’ is a moot point.
Justin (d. about 165 C.E.) mentions two sects of Jewish Christians: one which declared that circumcision and
obedience to the ceremonial law were obligatory only for Christians of Jewish
origin; the other, which held that these requirements should be universal
obligations. Later, Irenaeus described
the Ebionites as Jewish Christians who denied the divinity and virgin birth
of Jesus, clung to the observance of the Mosaic Law, and used only the gospel
of Matthew. The Minim,
or sectaries, mentioned in the Talmud, were apparently the same Jewish
Christians. The break between them and
the other Jews seems to have occurred either at the time of the destruction
of the Second Temple (70 C.E.) or during the Bar Kochba revolt (132-35), when
the Jewish Christians, expecting the permanent destruction of the Temple in
accordance with the words of Jesus, preferred the side of the Romans, and were
hence detested as traitors and informers.
[“Informers” is a Jewish synonym for Christian for this reason. Everytime a Jew says his Eighteen
Benedictions he prays for the “annihilation” of the “informers.” Some argue this is precisely a Jewish
prayer for the annihilation of all Christians.] |
|
|
|
“From
the 2nd cent. on the Jewish Christian group disintegrated. Separated from Christian and Jew alike,
they gradually drifted to one side or the other. Nevertheless, small Jewish Christian
communities remained in isolation in Palestine and in Syria until the 4the
and 5th centuries. They made no
proselyte, but scholars have contended that they may have contributed to the
rise of Islam in the succeeding centuries.”
The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1942, volume 6, p. 95. |
|
|
|
The Talmud Came After the Ministry of Jesus Christ |
|
|
|
Modern Judaism was created after the time Jesus Christ walked the Earth. At the time of Jesus Christ’s ministry, the Pharisees were espousing primitive Judaism. All of the written Talmud was prepared after the ministry of Jesus Christ, and much of the text was written in reaction to Jesus Christ and Christians. |
|
|
|
Michael L. Rodkinson (Jewish, real name M. Levi Frumkin) in volume 10, second section, pages 4-42 of his Babylonian Talmud, clearly states the chronological history of the Talmud: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further additions to the Talmud were made during the period of the Saboraim, roughly 500 AD and 700 AD. The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1943, volume 10, p. 160. |
|
|
|
The Written Talmud Was Produced between 50 AD and
700 AD |
|
|
|
The written, as opposed to oral, Talmud was generally produced between 50 AD and 700 AD. The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1943, volume 10, p. 160-164. |
|
|
|
“Tradition declares that Ashi (died 427 AD), with the able assistance of Rabina, was the first to sift, clarify and edit this accumulated material…Although Ashi went through the material twice, he did not succeed in completing the work which he had set out to do, and it was left to other scholars, the chief of whom was Rabina bar Huna (died 499 AD), to fill in the gaps, add new material, and make certain changes to the arrangement. With Rabina’s death the Talmud was closed except for the finishing touches of the Saboraim (6th and 7th centuries AD), who made certain minor additions, as well as frequently indicating the final decision in cases of conflicting opinions.” The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1943, volume 10, p. 164. |
|
|
|
God Promised the Israelites that He Would Write His Law in
the Hearts of Their Descendants |
|
|
|
“Behold, the days come saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah…But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel: After those days, saith the Lord: I will put my laws into their inward parts, and write it in their hearts: and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.” The Holy Bible, Jeremiah 31:33 and Hebrews 8:10 |
|
|
|
The people with God’s law written in their heart do not need to be told what is right and what is wrong. They burn when they see injustice and instinctively want true justice done. They know what is a crime…and what is not a crime…without having to be told. They naturally align in a society characterized by peaceful self-government and restraint. They don’t need a library of laws and regulations to tell them how to live. God’s elect know who they are…and they know the others among God’s elect by their fruits, not their words. “By their fruits ye shall know them.” |
|
|
|
Jesus Christ Came For the Benefit of the Israelites…Not
Non-Israelite Jews |
|
|
|
“‘I am not sent but unto the lost [put-away-in-separation] sheep of the House of Israel.’” The Holy Bible, Matthew 15:24. |
|
|
|
Jesus Christ was the kinsman redeemer for his racial kinsmen…the ones who have God’s Law in their hearts. His ministry was to restore the true genetic Israelites to God and God’s Law. |
|
|
|
“Then came the Jews round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou make us to doubt? If though be the Christ, tell us plainly. Jesus answered them, ‘I told you, and ye believed not: the works that I do in my Father’s name, they bear witness of me. But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any pluck them out of my hand.’” The Holy Bible, John 10:24-29 |
|
|
|
The reason these Jews could not understand Jesus Christ was because they were not true Israelites…they were Canaanites (like the Herods) and Edomites and mixed-race hybrids who had usurped positions among the Israelites. They were not Jesus Christ’s “sheep.” |
|
|
|
It’s the followers of Jesus Christ who have Gods law written in their heart who built their nations, built their courthouses, built their schools and put God’s Law on their courthouse walls and in their school text books. Those without God’s law written on their hearts, claw the Ten Commandments off the court house walls, throw God out of the schools, and use the sacred name of Jesus Christ as a curse word in their God damn motion pictures. |
|
|
|
God’s Curse |
|
|
|
Persons who are not “lacking in knowledge” know God’s warning to those having God’s law written in their hearts: If you reject God’s law, God will reject you. |
|
|
|
“And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt harken diligently unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe and to do all his commandments which I command thee this day, that the Lord thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth…And the Lord shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath… |
|
|
|
“But if it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken onto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe to do all his commandments and his statutes which I command thee this day; that all these curses shall come upon thee, and overtake thee: Cursed shalt thou be in the city…thou shalt betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her; thou shalt build an house, and thou shalt not dwell therein…thy sons and daughters shall be given unto another people…the fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shalt be only oppressed and crushed away…the stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low. He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him: he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail…and ye shall be left few in number, whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude; because thou wouldest not obey the voice of the Lord thy God…and thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and shalt have none assurances of thy life…” The Holy Bible, Deuteronomy 28: 1-66. |
|
|
|
Why Do Jews Use the Word “Judeo-Christian?” |
|
|
|
Jews use the word
“Judeo-Christian” because they are trying to give credence to Judaism…because
they are trying to confuse and subject Christians…because they are mocking
their ignorant Goys…and because the word “Judeo-Christian” advances their
supremacist agenda. |
|
|
|
The now common usage of the
highly offensive term “Judeo-Christian” is totally the result of Jewish
propaganda and infiltration over the last seventy years. |
|
|
|
Conclusion:
All of Your ‘Red Flags’ Should Go Up Whenever You Encounter ‘Judeo-Christian’ |
|
|
|
The word “Judeo-Christian” is
highly offensive to any Christian who has sufficient knowledge of both
Christianity and Judaism. It should
never be used by anyone. |
|
|
|
When you hear or read the word
“Judeo-Christian” you should always assume that you are hearing or reading
Jewish supremacist propaganda and not sound doctrine. |
|
|
|
This is a Test of the International Jewish
Hate-Screaming Network |
|
|
|
If you feel that you may have been
duped by the American Jewish Committee’s subversion of Christian books and
publications…or if you have experienced teachings from persons who use the
Jewish-supremacist code word “Judeo-Christian”…then here’s a book to
consider… |
|
|
|
It’s written by an individual
whose name triggers certain Jews to start screaming
“hater…hater…hater…hater.” The Jews
scream “hater…hater…hater…hater” in the hopes that you’ll be scared off and
won’t read something these certain Jews don’t want you to read. |
|
|
|
Christianity vs. Judeo-Christianity |
|
|
|
The book is Christianity vs.
Judeo-Christianity, written by Malcolm Ross (Christian) in 1987. For this book and a few other books, many
Jews spent much effort and treasure to destroy Malcolm Ross’s life. The book is rather short and well
documented. If you’re a Christian,
after reading this book, you’ll never use the phrase “Judeo-Christian” again
other than in the context of Jewish scams.
(available here) |
|
|
|
Don’t Buy This Book Unless You Like Being
Very, Very Upset |
|
|
|
At the Stronghold Publishing
Internet site, they also offer another book (Cross-Examination) which
I RECOMMEND YOU DO NOT BUY. I read this
book and I thought I’d have a heart attack every ten pages. I honestly had to stop reading and get up
and walk around every ten or fifteen minutes…this book made me so
unbelievably upset. There’s no book
I’ve ever read that got my heart beating so fast and my fists clenched so
tight. All the book contains is long
excerpts from the court transcripts of Malcolm Ross’s defense against Jewish
legal attacks on a Christian defending the Christian faith. Ross’s “legal” ordeal began when David
Attis (Jewish) made a complaint against the school that employed Malcolm
Ross. Attis’s daughter had once
visited the school to see a gymnastics meet.
Attis was/is International Secretary of the Canadian Jewish Congress,
president of the Atlantic Jewish Council, and Associate Chairman of the
Canadian Jewish Congress. The Canadian
Jewish Congress joined Attis in the complaint. There are many despicable quotations in
these transcripts…among the worst is the testimony of the Jewish girl Yona
Attis, David Attis’s daughter: “I took
my fingers and I put them in his eyes and I just dug. They didn’t come out but—that was my
intention…my intention was to rip out his eyes…(And you came close.)…Yes.” This refers to a fight the Attis girl had
with a student in her school art class…and it’s her own testimony! If you
like court cases, or if you like reading about how certain Jews destroy
Christian lives, this book would be for you…but, it’ll be upsetting… |
