|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Footnote |
|
|
|
to |
|
|
|
A Few Comments On The Jewish
Supremacist Organization |
|
Known As The American Jewish
Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
Blacks Began to Realize They had Been Used by the
Jews |
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard Dinnerstein indicated the Black-Jew relationship started to sour when Blacks started seeing with their eyes that the Jews were taking their prize: |
|
|
|
“In the 1960s angry and rising younger leaders like Cecil Moore of Philadelphia, who regarded every Jew in the civil rights movement as ‘a goddamn phoney,’ and Malcolm X, who thought that the six million Jews annihilated by Hitler ‘brought it on themselves,’ won enthusiastic followings. During that same decade the depth of black rage also became evident. One African American in Philadelphia asserted: ‘You know all those Jews in the civil rights marches and going down South—you know why they do it? They do it to take the heat off themselves. They’ve got a bad conscience because they live on black dollars.’ |
|
|
|
“Both knowledgeable blacks and Jews in the major defense and community relations organizations like the NAACP [which had been founded by Jews and at the time still had a Jewish President, an arrangement that remained as long as the NAACP was a primary tool of the Jews], the Urban League, CORE, ADL, AJC [American Jewish Committee], and the American Jewish Congress knew of the rising antisemitism [anti-Jewism] among blacks… |
|
|
|
“What many Jews then discovered, and what the younger and more combative blacks spoke out about fiercely, was that the goals of the two groups could not be the same because their conditions differed. Unequal treatment of blacks and whites in this country [the U.S.], as well as different economic circumstances, cultural values, historical experiences, and levels of skills, made shared strategies after passage of the Civil Rights Act difficult to obtain. Sociologist Nathan Glazer captured African American sentiments exactly when he wrote in 1964, ‘The Negro anger is based on the fact that the system of formal equality produces so little for them.’ Jews had been well educated, ranked as the wealthiest ethnic group in America, and were positioned to benefit from equal opportunities in a wide variety of areas once they became available. |
|
|
|
“But equality of opportunity for blacks did not significantly advance the group’s position… |
|
|
|
“As the disappointments mounted from the failure of both the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision and the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Act of 1964 and 1965 to produce significant improvements in their lives, many African Americans rallied behind younger and more aggressive leaders. Black rhetoric turned increasingly nationalistic, and their new militancy included a greater identification with dark-skinned peoples in the Third World, Marxism, opposition to Israel [sic.], and mounting antisemitism [anti-Jewism]. The escalation of black nationalism cemented the younger leaders’ beliefs that African Americans must control the direction of their cause.” Anti-Semitism in America, p. 210-211. |
|
|
|
Remarkably, Dinnerstein identifies the truth: The Jews used the Blacks simply as stooges and cannon fodder to get “Civil Rights” laws that would benefit the Jews. The Jews knew that once the laws were in place the laws would advance the supremacy of the Jews vastly more than the equality of the Blacks. It’s unfair for Dinnerstein to pretend to know Black aspirations. But, it nevertheless certainly seems fair that if Jews have a Jew-only country, then Black nationalism should be accepted and Blacks should have some Black-only countries just as the Jews have a Jew-only country. |
|
|
|
Maybe the Chinese should have a Chinese-only country…and maybe the Japanese should have a Japanese-only country…and maybe the Mexicans should have a Mexicans-only country. But, never forget, if a White or a Christian expresses a desire for a White-only country or a Christian-only country, then the American Jewish Committee will label such a person “a hater…a hater…a hater…a hater…” the American Jewish Committee Jews will scream “hate…hate…hate…hate” and “there’s no room for hate in our community.” Very hypocritical, but oh so true. Why do Whites and Christians tolerate this? They shouldn’t. |
|
|
|
Dinnerstein’s better at capturing the Jews’ mind-set on the Jewish side of Black-Jewish relationships. And of course, he discovers that the underlying problem is the Blacks’ Christianity: |
|
|
|
“Until the 1960s most Americans, if they thought of the subject at all, assumed that African Americans and Jews were allied in common cause. That was never quite true, and by the late 1960s expressions of public antipathy, especially on the part of blacks toward Jews, made headlines throughout the country. In subsequent decades respected black leaders have often targeted Jews for opprobrium in a manner that would have ended the public careers of white persons who articulated identical words or sentiments. |
|
|
|
“African-American antagonism toward Jews, however, is no more a phenomenon of recent decades than white antisemitism [anti-Jewism] is. Of all American groups, few are tied to their fundamentalist Protestant religious heritage as are those of southern ancestry—backs and whites. The genesis of their hostility toward Jews has more to do with religious teachings than with personal interactions.” Anti-Semitism in America, p. 248. |
|
|
|
It seems Dinnerstein is saying the Jews were willing to work with the Blacks even though the Blacks were Christians because it was in the Jews’ interest. Now, that the Blacks aren’t as necessary to the Jewish agenda, it’s OK to start setting up the Blacks as anti-Jewish because of their Christian beliefs. |
|
|
|
It’s a disappointment that Dinnerstein didn’t elaborate why “respected black leaders” can say things that Jews don’t like while Whites doing the same would have their public careers ended. Isn’t this a remarkably strange commentary on American society where Whites were recently 90% of the population (now down to 70%) and Jews have been less than 3%? Isn’t it a strange commentary on American Christians? Shouldn’t the situation be addressed, discussed, and remedied? Could this circumstance of Whites’ careers being destroyed have anything to do with the supremacist American Jewish Committee, other supremacist Jews, and race-traitor Goys among the Whites and Christians? |
|
|
|
|