Misconduct.org

 

Disclaimer

 

Anti-Christian Discrimination

At Indiana University

 

Footnote

 

to

 

A Few Comments On The Jewish Supremacist Organization

Known As The American Jewish Committee

 

 

How Did Louis Brandeis Ever Become a U.S. Supreme Court Justice?

 

 

 

 

The Child of European Radicals, Brandeis Dismantled The Legal Heritage That Built Western Society

 

“Brandeis, Louis Dembitz [Jewish]…born Louisville, Kentucky, 1859.  His parents, Adolf and Fredericka (Dembitz) Brandeis, had fled from Germany after the failure of the 1848 revolutionary movement.”  The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1940, volume 2, p. 495.

 

“The term communism, prior to 1848, was usually applied to revolutionary currents aiming at the violent overthrow of the entire social structure and the establishment of a collectivist form of production, while socialism stood for moderate tendencies advocating social reforms and a gradual and lawful change of the existing system.  The word Communist disappeared from the political vocabulary after 1848, when both moderate and radical opponents of capitalism [and Western Christian Society] began to call themselves Socialists or Social Democrats.  Communism reappeared as a current political term in connection with the November Revolution of 1917 in Russia, when the victorious Bolshevik Party adopted the old designation in 1918.”  The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1941, volume 3, p. 315.

 

Brandeis Promoted a ‘Lawful Change of the Existing System’

 

“Brandeis’ views of the law, too, were highly unorthodox.  He refused to interpret it in inflexible terms, exclusively in relation to precedent.  To the contrary, it was his belief that the law required constant change to fit the needs of a social order that was not static.  The law, he reasoned, does not operate in a vacuum.  It must be construed ‘in harmony with conditions and opinions prevailing from time to time.’  [Rule of man, not rule of law:  despotism.]   Motivated by such ideals, and envisaging society as a living organism, he was soon the antagonist of the vested interest…Through the gamut of activities, he acquired an insight into the bases of American industry [and society], and his findings of the facts in each specific problem led to the building of a unique social philosophy [government force in all aspects of human life], much of which was later to become the foundation of the New Deal program.”  The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1940, volume 2, p. 496.

 

Brandeis had been in private practice until the day he was put on the U.S. Supreme Court.

 

The American People Broke Into a Spontaneous Protest Against Wilson’s Unacceptable Nomination

 

“It was this ‘enemy of bigness’ [not true], “the people’s attorney,’ whom President Wilson [Presbyterian] nominated in 1916 for the Supreme Court of the United States.  The bombshell shook Washington as well as Wall Street.  In the Senate, a historic battle ensued over the confirmation.  It was Brandeis’ ‘radicalism,’ his alleged ‘lack of judicial temperament’ that precipitated the storm.  It brought a petition to the Senate to deny the appointment from seven former presidents of the American Bar Association, including Elihu Root [religion unknown], former Secretary of State, and William Howard Taft [Unitarian], former President of the United States.  The controversy dragged on for weeks, during which every aspect of Brandeis’ professional and personal life was most carefully scrutinized.  By a narrow margin the nomination was confirmed, and on June 5, 1916, Brandeis donned the robes of an Associate Justice.”  The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1940, volume 2, p. 496.

 

The World’s Greatest Advocate of the Jewish Takeover of Palestine

 

“The more he observed the patterns of Jewish life on the East Side of New York, the more intrigued he became.  He was carefully studying the problems of this group when he met Jacob de Hass [Jewish], a former secretary of Dr. Theodor Herzl [Jewish], founder of modern Zionism, and, at the time, editor of the Boston Jewish Advocate.  Brandeis joined the Zionist organization in 1912.  He came into the Zionist fold at a critical moment in the history of the movement…It became the responsibility of American Jews to save what was left in Palestine and to prevent the Zionist program from disintegrating.  He threw himself into the cause and soon rebuilt the tottering structure.  He brought into the movement some of the most influential men in America…In May of 1917…he discussed all the phases of the Zionist problem with Lord Balfour [religion unknown].”  The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1940, volume 2, p. 496

 

Can a Jew Be an American?  Should Jewish Ideals Replace America’s Christian Ideals?

 

“After his appointment to the Supreme Court…he was constantly consulted when major policies were involved…He never worried about such academic perplexities as the compatibility of Americanism with a minority culture [Jewism] or a Jewish Homeland in Palestine.  Rather, he believes in an America that welcomes diversity, that encourages cultural uniqueness.  He feels keenly that the Jews, as Jews, have contributions to make.  This feeling is epitomized in his words:  ‘The twentieth-century ideals of America have been the ideals of the Jew [not the Israelites] for twenty centuries [Brandeis knew if the Jews were Israelites the correct. period would have been thirty-four centuries, not twenty centuries.  The Jews’ religion was mostly developed after the ministry of Jesus Christ and the Jews aren’t The Holy Bible’s Israelites.]’…As a jurist Brandeis has …transformed staid and legal traditions into sturdy pillars of support upon which might rest the social changes of the day…Beneath the factual approach to each case with which Brandeis dealt, one finds a pragmatic approach to social problems as a whole:  a belief in the use of novel social devices, if, as and when they work….Counsel frequently failed to make a clear enough presentation of a case to satisfy Brandeis.  So, as a member of the Supreme Court, he resorted to fact-finding agencies on his own account.  [If the facts in a case didn’t support a decision that Brandeis as a Jewish activist wanted, he simply became his own advocate, ‘introduced’ his own evidence, and made judicial decisions based upon evidence he himself submitted.]…He refused to regard social and economic life only in the light of the logical fictions carefully built up by jurists [America’s legal heritage].  His reason for supporting any particular social enactment may be and usually is, as he himself admits, ‘partly legal, partly sentimental and partly a recognition of economic rights and sound social policy.’  [He viewed himself as judge-tyrant who could make any decree for any reasons regardless how dishonest and damaging.  He exhibited no concept of rule of law, only rule of the judicial tyrant.]…The truth of his conviction that our individualistic philosophy of rights and property could no longer furnish an adequate basis for dealing with the problems of modern economic life, is now generally recognized [by those wanting to throw out the Western Christian heritage of legal rights of individuals in order that they may rule over a nation of dumbed-down, numbered human resources that are owned by their masters.]…To the ardent young seekers for human betterment, he says, further, that there should be no short cuts in the movement for social improvement.  Wire tapping and espionage are implements as wicked in the hands of those wishing a desired social change as in the hands of industrial despots. [The law is changeable to Brandeis and this comment would change if Brandeis’ own ‘sound social policy’ necessitated rejecting his own previous position.]”  The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1940, volume 2, p. 497-499.

 

The Law Partner of Louis Marshall (American Jewish Committee President) Blackmailed Woodrow Wilson to get Brandeis on the Supreme Court

 

“Shortly after President Wilson’s first inauguration, he received a visitor in the White House by the name of Mr. Samuel Untermyer [Jewish].  Mr. Untermyer was a prominent New York City attorney who contributed generously to the National Democratic Committee that installed President Wilson in the White House in Washington in the 1912 election.  Mr. Untermyer was a very welcome guest and President Wilson was very glad to welcome him to the White House.  They had met before during the campaign.

 

“Mr. Untermyer surprised President Wilson when he finally stated what brought him to the White House.  Mr. Untermyer informed President Wilson that he had been retained to bring a breach of promise action against President Wilson.  Mr. Untermyer informed President Wilson that his client was willing to accept $40,000.00 in lieu of commencing the breach of promise action.  Mr. Untermyer's client was the former wife of a Professor at Princeton University at the same time President Wilson was a professor at Princeton University.

 

“Mr. Untermyer produced a packet of letters from his pocket, written by President Wilson to his colleague’s wife when they were neighbors at Princeton University.  These letters established the illicit relationship which had existed between President Wilson and the wife of his colleague neighbor.  He had written many endearing letters to her, many of which she never destroyed.  President Wilson acknowledged his authorship of the letters after examining a few of them.

 

“President Wilson left Princeton University to become the Governor of New Jersey. In 1912 he was elected to his first term as president of the United States.  In the interim, President Wilson’s former sweetheart had divorced her husband and married again.  Her second husband resident in Washington with a grown son who was in the employ of one of the leading banks in Washington.

 

“Mr. Untermyer explained to President Wilson that his former sweetheart was very fond of her husband’s son.  He explained that this son was in financial trouble and suddenly needed $40,000.00 as he told the story to liquidate a pressing liability to the bank for which he worked.  The details are not relevant here except that the son needed the $40,000.00 badly and quickly. President Wilson’s former sweetheart thought that Wilson was the logical prospect for that $40,000.00 to help her husband’s son.

 

“Mr. Untermyer visited President Wilson at the White House to break the news to him about the breach of promise action being considered.  Wilson expressed himself as very fortunate that his former sweetheart went to Mr. Untermyer to seek his assistance.  The publicity could have proven very embarrassing to President Wilson if his former sweetheart had instead consulted a Republican attorney.

 

“President Wilson quickly set Mr. Untermyer’s mind at rest by informing him that he did not have $40,000.00 available for any purpose.  Mr. Untermyer suggested that President Wilson should think the matter over and said he would return in a few days to discuss the matter further.  Mr. Untermyer used the next few days in Washington looking into the credibility of the son’s story about his pressing need for $40,000.00 to liquidate a pressing liability.  He learned that the son’s story was not misrepresented in any way to his mother by her son.

 

“Mr. Untermyer returned to President Wilson a few days later as they had agreed.  President Wilson did not hesitate to inform Mr. Untermyer that he did not have the $40,000.00 to pay his blackmailer.  President Wilson appeared irritated.  Mr. Untermyer considered the matter a few moments and then volunteered a solution to President Wilson for his problem.

 

“Mr. Untermyer volunteered to give President Wilson’s former sweetheart the $40,000.00 out of his own pocket on one condition: that Wilson promise Untermyer to appoint to the first vacancy on the United States Supreme Court a nominee to be recommended to Wilson by Untermyer.

 

“Without further talk, President Wilson accepted Mr. Untermyer's generous offer and Mr. Untermyer promptly paid the $40,000.00 in currency to President Wilson’s former sweetheart.  The contemplated breach of promise suit was never heard of after that.  Mr. Untermyer retained in his possession permanently the packet of letters to insure against any similar attempt at some future time.  President Wilson was most grateful to Mr. Untermyer for everything he was doing to solve his problem.

 

“Mr. Untermyer was a man of great wealth.  The law firm in New York of which he was the leading partner, Messrs. Guggenheimer, Untermyer and Marshall, is still today one of the nation’s most prominent and most prosperous law firms.  [Marshall was Louis Marshall (Jewish), American Jewish Committee President 1912-1929.]  Mr. Untermyer organized the Bethlehem Steel Company for his friend, Mr. Charles M. Schwab, who resigned from the United States Steel Company to form his company in competition with it.

 

“As anyone might reasonably suspect, Mr. Untermyer must have had something in mind when he agreed to pay President Wilson’s former sweetheart $40,000.00 out of his own pocket.  He paid the money out of his own pocket in the hope that it might bring to pass a dream close to his heart—a Talmudist (“Jew”) on the United States Supreme Court on which none had ever served.

 

“The day soon arrived when President Wilson was presented with the necessity of appointing a new member of the United States Supreme Court. Mr. Untermyer recommended Louis Dembitz Brandeis for the vacancy, who was immediately appointed by Wilson.  President Wilson and Justice Brandeis became unusually intimate friends. Justice Brandeis knew the circumstances of his appointment to the Supreme Court by President Wilson.

 

“In 1914 Justice Brandeis was the most prominent and most politically influential of all Zionists in the United States.  As a Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Brandeis was in a better position than ever before to be of service to Talmudists (“Jews”) both at home and abroad.”

 

Benjamin H. Freedman (Catholic, born Jewish), The Hidden Tyranny, circa 1972, p. 6-8.  [Freedman repeated this history in many of his writings and speeches.]

 

The female involved in Wlison’s love letters may have been Mary Allen Peck (religion unknown), or Wilson may have had more than on love interest.  [see Hope Ridings Miller, Scandals in the Highest Office, 1973, p. 196.]

 

Benjamin’s Freedman’s father (Jewish) was a personal friend of American Jewish Committee Founder Jacob Schiff (Jewish).  Benjamin Freedman was acquainted with Samuel Untermyer.  Freedman has claimed that he was shown the Wilson love letters… “Wilson was a great letter writer.  He knew the language; there’s no doubt about it, Wilson knew his vocabulary, when it came to making love, anyway.”

 

Franklin D. Roosevelt’s [Episcopalian, purported Jewish ancestry] son-in-law Curtis B. Dall (religion unknown, married and divorced from Anna Roosevelt) was a great supporter of Benjamin Freedman.

 

Freedman also stated that Brandeis was fully involved in the Jewish deal for Palestine and was thus totally eager to get the U.S. into World War I.  Freedman states it was Brandeis who convinced Woodrow Wilson that it was legal under international law for the U.S. to declare war against Germany in 1917.  Freedman also stated that the Germans could care less about the Jews religious practices, rather it was the Jewish World War I treachery that turned the Germans against the Jews …Freedman says it was the Jews’ subversion that the Germans reacted to.  Freedman further states that the Jews added to their offenses against the German population with their Weimar Republic run-away inflation and with Samuel Untermyer’s worldwide boycott of German products.  In a speech broadcast over the entire United States, Untermyer called the Jews “The Aristocrats of the World” and said, we Jews “will bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends…we shall force them to learn…it is not sufficient that you buy no goods in Germany…you must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods…we will drive the last nail in the coffin…”  Freedman states this speech was nationally broadcast on the Columbia Broadcasting System (Jewish) in August 1933 and was reprinted in the August 7, 1933 New York Times (Jewish).   The Hidden Tyranny, p. 8-15.

 

[Of course, a couple years later, even after Herschel Grynzspan (Jewish) assassinated the German official Ernst vom Rath in November 1938, the Jews expressed surprise when the German population rioted against them.]

 

“In that war [World War One] the United States mobilized 4,734,991 men to serve in the armed forces, of whom 115,516 were killed and 202,002 were either injured or maimed for life.”  The Hidden Tyranny, p. 5.

 

Louis Brandeis’ played one of the single most paramount roles in opening the doors of the United States government to Jews and transforming the United States and the world for the benefit of the Jews, and the disadvantage of the non-Jews.

 

Samuel Untermyer

 

“Untermyer was a leading figure in the legal and civic life of his time…Untermyer represented William G. McAdoo, Secretary of the Treasury, and John Skelton Williams, Controller of the Currency, successfully defending them against charges of conspiracy brought by the Riggs Bank in Washington….Untermyer was an independent Democrat of great influence in the councils of his party, but he never desired public office, and on one occasion declined to consider a suggested nomination as a Democratic candidate for United States senator from New York…[Untermyer] directed a counter-boycott against German goods…he was also for several years president of the Palestine Foundation Fund.  He was a believer in the principles of Zionism…”  The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1943, volume 10, p. 379.

 

(online book)  [No endorsement of this site is intended.  It is provided for academic research purposes only.]

 

Conclusion

 

The World was irrevocably changed by Louis Brandeis’ appointment to the United States Supreme Court.  The world has Samuel Untermyer, (Louis Marshall’s law partner), to hold responsible.

 

“America should have minded her own business and stayed out of the World War.  If you hadn’t entered the war the Allies would have made peace with Germany in the spring of 1917.  Had we made peace there would have been no collapse of Russia followed by Communism, no breakdown in Italy followed by Fascism, and Germany would not have signed the Versailles Treaty, which has enthroned Nazism in Germany.  If America had stayed out of the war, all of these ‘isms’ wouldn’t be sweeping the continent of Europe and breaking down parliamentary government, and if England made peace early in 1917, it would have saved over one million British, French, American and other lives.”  Winston Churchill (religion unknown, partial Jewish ancestry), quoted from “Scribner’s Commentator,” 1936, in The Hidden Tyranny, p. 12.